potato: is yummy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.69
, salad
Weight: 0.67
, vegetable
Weight: 0.67
, staple
Weight: 0.65
, crop
Weight: 0.64
Siblings potato salad
Weight: 0.75
, sweet potato
Weight: 0.74
, french fry
Weight: 0.57
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.38
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is yummy 1.00
taste sweet 0.80
is crunchy 0.79
is infinitely tasty 0.79
be called sweet 0.78
is yucky 0.78
has sweetness sweet 0.78
taste good freshly cooked 0.77
is salad 0.76
is fried 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, has sweetness sweet)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste good freshly cooked)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is fried)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, taste sweet)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has sweetness sweet)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be called sweet)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(potato salad, is salad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(sweet potato, taste sweet)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, taste sweet)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(sweet potato, be called sweet)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be called sweet)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(sweet potato, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, has sweetness sweet)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(potato salad, is salad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(potato salad, is salad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(tomato sauce, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, has sweetness sweet)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(french fry, is fried)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(french fry, taste good freshly cooked)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste good freshly cooked)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(potato, is yummy)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(potato, taste sweet)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(potato, be called sweet)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(potato, taste sweet)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(potato, has sweetness sweet)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(potato, is salad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(potato, taste sweet)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(potato, be called sweet)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(potato, has sweetness sweet)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(potato, be called sweet)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(potato, is salad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(potato, is salad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(potato, has sweetness sweet)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(potato, taste sweet)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(potato, has sweetness sweet)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(potato, be called sweet)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(potato, is salad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(potato, is yummy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(potato, is yummy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(sweet potato, taste sweet)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be called sweet)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(potato salad, is salad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(sweet potato, has sweetness sweet)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(french fry, is fried)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(french fry, taste good freshly cooked)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(potato, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, has sweetness sweet)