pothole: be bad in michigan

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, hazard
Weight: 0.55
, service
Weight: 0.54
, issue
Weight: 0.54
Siblings thyroid problem
Weight: 0.33
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.32
, toothache
Weight: 0.32
, flat tire
Weight: 0.32
, sinkhole
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad in michigan 1.00
is vermont 0.77
vermont 0.77
form in ontario 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(pothole, be bad in michigan)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(pothole, be bad in michigan)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(pothole, be bad in michigan)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(pothole, form in ontario)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(pothole, be bad in michigan)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(pothole, form in ontario)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(pothole, be bad in michigan)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(pothole, form in ontario)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(pothole, be bad in michigan)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(pothole, form in ontario)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(pothole, be bad in michigan)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(pothole, vermont)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(pothole, be bad in michigan)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(pothole, is vermont)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(pothole, be bad in michigan)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(pothole, vermont)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(pothole, be bad in michigan)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(pothole, is vermont)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(pothole, be bad in michigan)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(pothole, is vermont)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(pothole, be bad in michigan)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(pothole, vermont)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(pothole, be bad in michigan)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(pothole, is vermont)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(pothole, be bad in michigan)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(pothole, vermont)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(pothole, be bad in michigan)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(pothole, be bad in michigan)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(pothole, be bad in michigan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(pothole, be bad in michigan)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(pothole, be bad in michigan)