pottery: be both functional and artistic

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.61
, art
Weight: 0.59
, medium
Weight: 0.58
, artifact
Weight: 0.57
, debris
Weight: 0.56
Siblings vase
Weight: 0.34
, antique
Weight: 0.34
, ceramic
Weight: 0.34
, porcelain
Weight: 0.34
, artwork
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be both functional and artistic 1.00
be both functional and decorative 0.88
be functional 0.86
be defined as expression of creativity in physical term 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(art, be functional)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(pottery, be both functional and artistic)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(art, be defined as expression of creativity in physical term)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(pottery, be both functional and artistic)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(pottery, be both functional and artistic)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(art, be functional)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(pottery, be both functional and artistic)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(art, be defined as expression of creativity in physical term)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(pottery, be both functional and artistic)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(art, be functional)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(pottery, be both functional and artistic)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(art, be defined as expression of creativity in physical term)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(art, be functional)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(pottery, be both functional and artistic)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(pottery, be both functional and artistic)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(art, be defined as expression of creativity in physical term)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(pottery, be both functional and artistic)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(pottery, be both functional and artistic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(pottery, be both functional and artistic)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(pottery, be both functional and artistic)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(pottery, be both functional and artistic)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(pottery, be both functional and decorative)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(pottery, be both functional and artistic)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pottery, be both functional and decorative)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(pottery, be both functional and artistic)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pottery, be both functional and decorative)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(pottery, be both functional and artistic)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(pottery, be both functional and decorative)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(pottery, be both functional and artistic)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(pottery, be both functional and artistic)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(pottery, be both functional and artistic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(pottery, be both functional and artistic)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(pottery, be both functional and artistic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(pottery, be both functional and artistic)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(art, be functional)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(pottery, be both functional and artistic)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(art, be defined as expression of creativity in physical term)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(pottery, be both functional and artistic)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(art, be functional)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(pottery, be both functional and artistic)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(art, be defined as expression of creativity in physical term)