pottery: be considered functional art

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents handicraft
Weight: 0.70
, item
Weight: 0.61
, art
Weight: 0.59
, medium
Weight: 0.58
, artifact
Weight: 0.57
Siblings needlework
Weight: 0.37
, woodworking
Weight: 0.36
, calligraphy
Weight: 0.35
, quilting
Weight: 0.35
, vase
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered functional art 1.00
be considered art 0.88
be abstract developed 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(art, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(pottery, be considered functional art)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(pottery, be considered functional art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(art, be considered art)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pottery, be considered functional art) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(art, be considered art)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pottery, be considered functional art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, be considered art)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(art, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(pottery, be considered functional art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(pottery, be considered functional art)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(pottery, be considered functional art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(calligraphy, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, be considered art)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(pottery, be considered functional art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(pottery, be considered functional art)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(pottery, be considered functional art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(pottery, be considered art)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(pottery, be considered functional art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(pottery, be considered art)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(pottery, be considered functional art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pottery, be considered art)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(pottery, be considered functional art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pottery, be considered art)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(pottery, be considered functional art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(pottery, be considered functional art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pottery, be considered functional art)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(pottery, be considered functional art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(pottery, be considered functional art)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pottery, be considered functional art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(art, be considered art)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pottery, be considered functional art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(calligraphy, be considered art)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(pottery, be considered functional art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(art, be considered art)