pottery: be related to math

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents handicraft
Weight: 0.70
, item
Weight: 0.61
, art
Weight: 0.59
, medium
Weight: 0.58
, artifact
Weight: 0.57
Siblings needlework
Weight: 0.37
, woodworking
Weight: 0.36
, calligraphy
Weight: 0.35
, quilting
Weight: 0.35
, vase
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to math 1.00
be related 0.76
be better than science 0.76
was used in science 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(art, be related)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(pottery, be related to math)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(art, be better than science)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(pottery, be related to math)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(pottery, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(art, be better than science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(pottery, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(art, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pottery, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(art, be better than science)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pottery, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(art, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(art, be related)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(pottery, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(pottery, be related to math)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(art, be better than science)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(pottery, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(pottery, be related to math)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(pottery, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(pottery, be related to math)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(pottery, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(pottery, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pottery, be related to math)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(pottery, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(pottery, be related to math)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pottery, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(art, be better than science)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pottery, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(art, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(pottery, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(art, be better than science)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(pottery, be related to math)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(art, be related)