poverty: affect people in australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents violence
Weight: 0.67
, risk
Weight: 0.63
, income
Weight: 0.62
, crime
Weight: 0.62
, barrier
Weight: 0.62
Siblings inequality
Weight: 0.35
, income tax
Weight: 0.34
, unemployment
Weight: 0.34
, corruption
Weight: 0.33
, obesity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect people in australia 1.00
happen in australia 0.93
exist in australia 0.91
exist in canada 0.83
exist in uk 0.80
exist in india 0.79
be in india 0.79
be problem in usa 0.78
be in africa effect 0.77
be in india problem 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(poverty, affect people in australia)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be in india)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(poverty, affect people in australia)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be in india)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(poverty, affect people in australia)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(obesity, be problem in usa)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(poverty, affect people in australia)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inequality, exist in uk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(poverty, affect people in australia)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(inequality, exist in uk)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(inequality, exist in uk)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(poverty, affect people in australia)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(corruption, be in india)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(corruption, be in india)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(poverty, affect people in australia)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(unemployment, be in india)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(unemployment, be in india)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(poverty, affect people in australia)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(obesity, be problem in usa)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(obesity, be problem in usa)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(poverty, affect people in australia)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(poverty, affect people in australia)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(poverty, affect people in australia)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in india)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(poverty, affect people in australia)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(poverty, exist in india)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(poverty, affect people in australia)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(poverty, be in india)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(poverty, affect people in australia)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(poverty, exist in india)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(poverty, affect people in australia)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, exist in india)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(poverty, affect people in australia)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(poverty, be in africa effect)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(poverty, affect people in australia)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(poverty, be in africa effect)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(poverty, affect people in australia)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in africa effect)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(poverty, affect people in australia)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(poverty, exist in india)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(poverty, affect people in australia)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(poverty, be in africa effect)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(poverty, affect people in australia)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(poverty, be in india)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(poverty, affect people in australia)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(poverty, be in india)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(poverty, affect people in australia)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(poverty, affect people in australia)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(poverty, affect people in australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(poverty, affect people in australia)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(poverty, affect people in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(poverty, affect people in australia)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(inequality, exist in uk)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(poverty, affect people in australia)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(corruption, be in india)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(poverty, affect people in australia)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(unemployment, be in india)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(poverty, affect people in australia)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(obesity, be problem in usa)