poverty: be in pakistan increasing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents violence
Weight: 0.67
, risk
Weight: 0.63
, income
Weight: 0.62
, crime
Weight: 0.62
, barrier
Weight: 0.62
Siblings inequality
Weight: 0.35
, income tax
Weight: 0.34
, unemployment
Weight: 0.34
, corruption
Weight: 0.33
, obesity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in pakistan increasing 1.00
be reduced in future in india 0.81
be reduced in afghanistan 0.80
decrease in nepal 0.79
increase in singapore 0.78
increase in uk 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(crime, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(poverty, be in pakistan increasing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(poverty, be in pakistan increasing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(crime, increase in uk)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in pakistan increasing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(crime, increase in uk)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in pakistan increasing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(obesity, increase in singapore)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(crime, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(poverty, be in pakistan increasing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(poverty, be in pakistan increasing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(poverty, be in pakistan increasing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(obesity, increase in singapore) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(obesity, increase in singapore)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(poverty, be in pakistan increasing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(poverty, be in pakistan increasing)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(poverty, be in pakistan increasing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(poverty, be reduced in afghanistan)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(poverty, be in pakistan increasing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(poverty, increase in uk)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(poverty, be in pakistan increasing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(poverty, be reduced in future in india)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(poverty, be in pakistan increasing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(poverty, increase in uk)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(poverty, be in pakistan increasing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(poverty, increase in uk)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(poverty, be in pakistan increasing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(poverty, increase in uk)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(poverty, be in pakistan increasing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(poverty, be reduced in afghanistan)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(poverty, be in pakistan increasing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(poverty, be reduced in future in india)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(poverty, be in pakistan increasing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(poverty, be reduced in afghanistan)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(poverty, be in pakistan increasing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(poverty, be reduced in future in india)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(poverty, be in pakistan increasing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be reduced in future in india)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(poverty, be in pakistan increasing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be reduced in afghanistan)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(poverty, be in pakistan increasing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(poverty, be in pakistan increasing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in pakistan increasing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(poverty, be in pakistan increasing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(poverty, be in pakistan increasing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in pakistan increasing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(crime, increase in uk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in pakistan increasing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(obesity, increase in singapore)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(poverty, be in pakistan increasing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(crime, increase in uk)