poverty: be prevalent in philippines

Related concepts

Parents	violence Weight: 0.67 , risk Weight: 0.63 , income Weight: 0.62 , crime Weight: 0.62 , barrier Weight: 0.62
Siblings	inequality Weight: 0.35 , income tax Weight: 0.34 , unemployment Weight: 0.34 , corruption Weight: 0.33 , obesity Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be prevalent in philippines	1.00
be rampant in philippines	0.92
persist in philippines	0.90
be most prevalent in developed countries	0.75
be peculiar problem in india	0.75
be peculiar problem for india	0.75
be more prevalent in film	0.75
be peculiar problem of india	0.75
be peculiar problem to india	0.75
be more prevalent in developed countries	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(poverty, be prevalent in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be rampant in philippines)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(poverty, be prevalent in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be peculiar problem for india)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(poverty, be prevalent in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be peculiar problem of india)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(poverty, be prevalent in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be peculiar problem in india)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(poverty, be prevalent in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(corruption, be rampant in philippines)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(poverty, be prevalent in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(unemployment, be peculiar problem of india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(unemployment, be peculiar problem of india)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(poverty, be prevalent in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(unemployment, be peculiar problem in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(unemployment, be peculiar problem in india)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(poverty, be prevalent in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(unemployment, be peculiar problem for india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(unemployment, be peculiar problem for india)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(poverty, be prevalent in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Salient(poverty, be prevalent in philippines)

Similarity expansion

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(poverty, be prevalent in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Salient(poverty, be rampant in philippines)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(poverty, be prevalent in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(poverty, be rampant in philippines)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(poverty, be prevalent in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(poverty, be rampant in philippines)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(poverty, be prevalent in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(poverty, be rampant in philippines)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(poverty, be prevalent in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(poverty, persist in philippines)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(poverty, be prevalent in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(poverty, persist in philippines)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(poverty, be prevalent in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(poverty, persist in philippines)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(poverty, be prevalent in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(poverty, persist in philippines)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(poverty, be prevalent in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(poverty, be prevalent in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(poverty, be prevalent in philippines)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(poverty, be prevalent in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(poverty, be prevalent in philippines)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(poverty, be prevalent in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(corruption, be rampant in philippines)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(poverty, be prevalent in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(unemployment, be peculiar problem of india)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(poverty, be prevalent in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(unemployment, be peculiar problem in india)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(poverty, be prevalent in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(unemployment, be peculiar problem for india)