poverty: be problem in africa

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents violence
Weight: 0.67
, risk
Weight: 0.63
, income
Weight: 0.62
, crime
Weight: 0.62
, barrier
Weight: 0.62
Siblings inequality
Weight: 0.35
, income tax
Weight: 0.34
, unemployment
Weight: 0.34
, corruption
Weight: 0.33
, obesity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem in africa 1.00
be problem in south africa 0.96
be in sub-saharan africa 0.92
be in africa 0.92
be problem in zimbabwe 0.90
be high in africa 0.89
be in africa effect 0.88
be in places like africa 0.88
be in india problem 0.87
be high in south africa 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(crime, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(poverty, be problem in africa)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(poverty, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(crime, be high in south africa)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(crime, be high in south africa)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be problem in south africa)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in south africa)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(crime, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(poverty, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(poverty, be problem in africa)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(poverty, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(unemployment, be problem in south africa)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(unemployment, be problem in south africa)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(poverty, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(unemployment, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(unemployment, be high in south africa)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(poverty, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(poverty, be problem in africa)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(poverty, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in sub-saharan africa)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(poverty, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be high in africa)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(poverty, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in africa)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(poverty, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(poverty, be high in africa)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(poverty, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(poverty, be high in africa)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(poverty, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(poverty, be in sub-saharan africa)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(poverty, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be high in south africa)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(poverty, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(poverty, be high in south africa)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(poverty, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(poverty, be in africa)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(poverty, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in africa effect)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(poverty, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(poverty, be high in south africa)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(poverty, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(poverty, be in africa)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(poverty, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(poverty, be in sub-saharan africa)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(poverty, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(poverty, be in africa)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(poverty, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(poverty, be in africa effect)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(poverty, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(poverty, be high in africa)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(poverty, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(poverty, be in africa effect)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(poverty, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(poverty, be in africa effect)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(poverty, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(poverty, be high in south africa)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(poverty, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(poverty, be in sub-saharan africa)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(poverty, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(poverty, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in africa)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(poverty, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(poverty, be problem in africa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(crime, be high in south africa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(unemployment, be high in south africa)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(unemployment, be problem in south africa)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(poverty, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(crime, be high in south africa)