poverty: be problem in madagascar

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents violence
Weight: 0.67
, risk
Weight: 0.63
, income
Weight: 0.62
, crime
Weight: 0.62
, barrier
Weight: 0.62
Siblings inequality
Weight: 0.35
, income tax
Weight: 0.34
, unemployment
Weight: 0.34
, corruption
Weight: 0.33
, obesity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem in madagascar 1.00
has state problem 0.93
be considered problem 0.93
be cause problem 0.92
be problem in us 0.92
is significant problem 0.89
be problem in states 0.88
is social problem 0.88
be cause social problem 0.86
be considered social problem 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(crime, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(poverty, be problem in madagascar)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(crime, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(poverty, be problem in madagascar)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(violence, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(poverty, be problem in madagascar)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(violence, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(poverty, be problem in madagascar)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(violence, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(violence, is social problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(crime, is social problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(crime, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(violence, has state problem)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(crime, has state problem)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(crime, is social problem)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(violence, is social problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, is social problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(obesity, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(corruption, has state problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has state problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(corruption, is social problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(crime, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(poverty, be problem in madagascar)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(violence, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(poverty, be problem in madagascar)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(crime, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(poverty, be problem in madagascar)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(violence, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(poverty, be problem in madagascar)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(inequality, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(inequality, has state problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(corruption, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(corruption, has state problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(obesity, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(obesity, has state problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(corruption, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(corruption, is social problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(inequality, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(unemployment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(unemployment, has state problem)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(unemployment, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(unemployment, is social problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(poverty, be problem in madagascar)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(poverty, has state problem)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(poverty, has state problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(poverty, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in madagascar)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(poverty, be problem in madagascar)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(violence, is social problem)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(crime, is social problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(violence, has state problem)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(crime, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(corruption, is social problem)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(inequality, has state problem)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(corruption, has state problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(inequality, is social problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(obesity, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(unemployment, is social problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(unemployment, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(violence, has state problem)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(violence, is social problem)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(crime, is social problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(poverty, be problem in madagascar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(crime, has state problem)