poverty: be rampant in philippines

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents violence
Weight: 0.67
, risk
Weight: 0.63
, income
Weight: 0.62
, crime
Weight: 0.62
, barrier
Weight: 0.62
Siblings inequality
Weight: 0.35
, income tax
Weight: 0.34
, unemployment
Weight: 0.34
, corruption
Weight: 0.33
, obesity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be rampant in philippines 1.00
be prevalent in philippines 0.92
persist in philippines 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be rampant in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be rampant in philippines)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(poverty, be rampant in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(corruption, be rampant in philippines)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(poverty, be rampant in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(poverty, be rampant in philippines)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(poverty, be rampant in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(poverty, persist in philippines)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(poverty, be rampant in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(poverty, be prevalent in philippines)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(poverty, be rampant in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be prevalent in philippines)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(poverty, be rampant in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(poverty, be prevalent in philippines)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(poverty, be rampant in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(poverty, persist in philippines)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(poverty, be rampant in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(poverty, be prevalent in philippines)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(poverty, be rampant in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(poverty, persist in philippines)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(poverty, be rampant in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(poverty, persist in philippines)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(poverty, be rampant in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(poverty, be rampant in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be rampant in philippines)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(poverty, be rampant in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(poverty, be rampant in philippines)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be rampant in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(corruption, be rampant in philippines)