poverty: continue in 2011

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents violence
Weight: 0.67
, risk
Weight: 0.63
, income
Weight: 0.62
, crime
Weight: 0.62
, barrier
Weight: 0.62
Siblings inequality
Weight: 0.35
, income tax
Weight: 0.34
, unemployment
Weight: 0.34
, corruption
Weight: 0.33
, obesity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
continue in 2011 1.00
persist 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(poverty, continue in 2011)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(corruption, persist)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(poverty, continue in 2011)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(inequality, persist)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(poverty, continue in 2011)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(inequality, persist)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(inequality, persist)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(poverty, continue in 2011)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(corruption, persist)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(corruption, persist)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(poverty, continue in 2011)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(poverty, continue in 2011)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(poverty, continue in 2011)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(poverty, persist)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(poverty, continue in 2011)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(poverty, persist)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(poverty, continue in 2011)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(poverty, persist)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(poverty, continue in 2011)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(poverty, persist)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(poverty, continue in 2011)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(poverty, continue in 2011)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(poverty, continue in 2011)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(poverty, continue in 2011)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(poverty, continue in 2011)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(poverty, continue in 2011)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(inequality, persist)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(poverty, continue in 2011)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(corruption, persist)