poverty: exist in free market economy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents violence
Weight: 0.67
, risk
Weight: 0.63
, income
Weight: 0.62
, crime
Weight: 0.62
, barrier
Weight: 0.62
Siblings inequality
Weight: 0.35
, income tax
Weight: 0.34
, unemployment
Weight: 0.34
, corruption
Weight: 0.33
, obesity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
exist in free market economy 1.00
exist in market economy 0.97
be bad for economy 0.85
affect economy 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(poverty, exist in free market economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be bad for economy)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(poverty, exist in free market economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(poverty, exist in free market economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, affect economy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(poverty, exist in free market economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(unemployment, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(unemployment, affect economy)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(poverty, exist in free market economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(unemployment, be bad for economy)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(poverty, exist in free market economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for economy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(poverty, exist in free market economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(poverty, exist in free market economy)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(poverty, exist in free market economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(poverty, exist in market economy)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(poverty, exist in free market economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(poverty, exist in market economy)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(poverty, exist in free market economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(poverty, exist in market economy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(poverty, exist in free market economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(poverty, exist in market economy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(poverty, exist in free market economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(poverty, affect economy)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(poverty, exist in free market economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(poverty, affect economy)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(poverty, exist in free market economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(poverty, affect economy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(poverty, exist in free market economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(poverty, affect economy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(poverty, exist in free market economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(poverty, exist in free market economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(poverty, exist in free market economy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(poverty, exist in free market economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(poverty, exist in free market economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(poverty, exist in free market economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(unemployment, be bad for economy)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(poverty, exist in free market economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(unemployment, affect economy)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(poverty, exist in free market economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for economy)