poverty: is economic problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents violence
Weight: 0.67
, risk
Weight: 0.63
, income
Weight: 0.62
, crime
Weight: 0.62
, barrier
Weight: 0.62
Siblings inequality
Weight: 0.35
, income tax
Weight: 0.34
, unemployment
Weight: 0.34
, corruption
Weight: 0.33
, obesity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is economic problem 1.00
is social problem 0.85
be problem in madagascar 0.84
be considered social problem 0.84
has state problem 0.83
be cause social problem 0.83
is environmental problem 0.82
be considered problem 0.82
is significant environmental problem 0.81
be problem in us 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(crime, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(poverty, is economic problem)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(crime, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(poverty, is economic problem)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(violence, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(poverty, is economic problem)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(poverty, is economic problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(violence, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(violence, is social problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(crime, is social problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(crime, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(violence, has state problem)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(crime, has state problem)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(crime, is social problem)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(violence, is social problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, is social problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(obesity, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(corruption, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(corruption, is social problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(crime, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(poverty, is economic problem)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(crime, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(poverty, is economic problem)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(violence, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(poverty, is economic problem)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(poverty, is economic problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(corruption, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(corruption, is social problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(inequality, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(inequality, has state problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(corruption, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(corruption, has state problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(inequality, is environmental problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(obesity, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(obesity, has state problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(unemployment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(unemployment, is social problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(unemployment, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(unemployment, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(poverty, is economic problem)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(poverty, has state problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(poverty, be problem in madagascar)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(poverty, has state problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(poverty, be problem in madagascar)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(poverty, has state problem)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(poverty, be problem in madagascar)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in madagascar)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(poverty, is economic problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(violence, is social problem)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(crime, is social problem)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(violence, has state problem)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(crime, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(inequality, is economic problem)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(corruption, is social problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(inequality, is social problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(inequality, is environmental problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(inequality, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(corruption, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(unemployment, is social problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(obesity, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(unemployment, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(violence, is social problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(crime, is social problem)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(violence, has state problem)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(crime, has state problem)