power line: be high in sky

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents line
Weight: 0.75
, utility
Weight: 0.70
, equipment
Weight: 0.66
, facility
Weight: 0.63
Siblings straight line
Weight: 0.39
, red line
Weight: 0.39
, blue line
Weight: 0.38
, telephone line
Weight: 0.38
, power plant
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be high in sky 1.00
is high 0.80
is high up 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(power line, be high in sky)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(telephone line, is high)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(power line, be high in sky)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(telephone line, is high)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(telephone line, is high)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(power line, be high in sky)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(power line, be high in sky)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(power line, be high in sky)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(power line, is high up)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(power line, be high in sky)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(power line, is high)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(power line, be high in sky)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(power line, is high up)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(power line, be high in sky)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(power line, is high)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(power line, be high in sky)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(power line, is high up)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(power line, be high in sky)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(power line, is high)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(power line, be high in sky)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(power line, is high)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(power line, be high in sky)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(power line, is high up)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(power line, be high in sky)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(power line, be high in sky)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(power line, be high in sky)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(power line, be high in sky)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(power line, be high in sky)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(power line, be high in sky)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(telephone line, is high)