power line: be over rivers raised

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents line
Weight: 0.75
, utility
Weight: 0.70
, equipment
Weight: 0.66
, facility
Weight: 0.63
Siblings straight line
Weight: 0.39
, red line
Weight: 0.39
, blue line
Weight: 0.38
, telephone line
Weight: 0.38
, power plant
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be over rivers raised 1.00
be over rivers raised high 0.98
be over rivers 0.91
be near rivers 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(power line, be over rivers raised)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be near rivers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(power line, be over rivers raised)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(power plant, be near rivers)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(power plant, be near rivers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(power line, be over rivers raised)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(power line, be over rivers raised)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(power line, be over rivers raised)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(power line, be over rivers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(power line, be over rivers raised)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(power line, be over rivers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(power line, be over rivers raised)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(power line, be over rivers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(power line, be over rivers raised)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(power line, be over rivers raised high)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(power line, be over rivers raised)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(power line, be over rivers raised high)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(power line, be over rivers raised)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(power line, be over rivers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(power line, be over rivers raised)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(power line, be over rivers raised high)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(power line, be over rivers raised)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(power line, be over rivers raised high)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(power line, be over rivers raised)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(power line, be over rivers raised)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(power line, be over rivers raised)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(power line, be over rivers raised)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(power line, be over rivers raised)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(power line, be over rivers raised)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(power plant, be near rivers)