power plant: be in world

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.77
, plant
Weight: 0.73
, utility
Weight: 0.68
Siblings natural gas
Weight: 0.70
, nuclear reactor
Weight: 0.69
, hydro
Weight: 0.68
, power
Weight: 0.67
, turbine
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in world 1.00
destroy world 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(nuclear power plant, destroy world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(power plant, be in world)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(power plant, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, destroy world)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, destroy world)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(nuclear power plant, destroy world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(power plant, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(power plant, be in world)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(power plant, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(power plant, be in world)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(power plant, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(power plant, destroy world)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(power plant, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(power plant, destroy world)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(power plant, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(power plant, destroy world)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(power plant, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(power plant, destroy world)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(power plant, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(power plant, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be in world)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(power plant, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(power plant, be in world)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, destroy world)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(power plant, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, destroy world)