power plant: be located in india

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.77
, plant
Weight: 0.73
, utility
Weight: 0.68
Siblings natural gas
Weight: 0.70
, nuclear reactor
Weight: 0.69
, hydro
Weight: 0.68
, power
Weight: 0.67
, turbine
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be located in india 1.00
be located near water 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be located near water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(power plant, be located in india)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(power plant, be located in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be located near water)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be located in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be located near water)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be located near water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(power plant, be located in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(power plant, be located in india)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(power plant, be located in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(power plant, be located in india)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(power plant, be located in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(power plant, be located near water)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(power plant, be located in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(power plant, be located near water)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(power plant, be located in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(power plant, be located near water)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(power plant, be located in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be located near water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(power plant, be located in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(power plant, be located in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be located in india)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(power plant, be located in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(power plant, be located in india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be located in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be located near water)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(power plant, be located in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be located near water)