power plant: be source of thermal pollution

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.77
, plant
Weight: 0.73
, utility
Weight: 0.68
Siblings natural gas
Weight: 0.70
, nuclear reactor
Weight: 0.69
, hydro
Weight: 0.68
, power
Weight: 0.67
, turbine
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be source of thermal pollution 1.00
contribute to thermal pollution 0.95
reduce effects of thermal pollution 0.91
be source of pollution 0.91
contribute to pollution 0.82
emit less greenhouse gases 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(nuclear power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(nuclear power plant, emit less greenhouse gases)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, emit less greenhouse gases)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, emit less greenhouse gases)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(nuclear power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(nuclear power plant, emit less greenhouse gases)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be source of pollution)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(power plant, contribute to pollution)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(power plant, be source of pollution)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(power plant, be source of pollution)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(power plant, contribute to pollution)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(power plant, be source of pollution)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(power plant, contribute to pollution)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(power plant, contribute to pollution)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, emit less greenhouse gases)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, emit less greenhouse gases)