power plant: be vs nuclear reactor

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.77
, plant
Weight: 0.73
, utility
Weight: 0.68
Siblings natural gas
Weight: 0.70
, nuclear reactor
Weight: 0.69
, hydro
Weight: 0.68
, power
Weight: 0.67
, turbine
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vs nuclear reactor 1.00
is vs nuclear 0.92
is nuclear 0.90
use uranium as fuel 0.77
be vs coal 0.76
is radioactive 0.75
use uranium 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(nuclear power plant, use uranium as fuel)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(nuclear power plant, is radioactive)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(nuclear power plant, use uranium)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, use uranium)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, is radioactive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, use uranium as fuel)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, use uranium)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, use uranium as fuel)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, is radioactive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, use uranium)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(nuclear power plant, use uranium as fuel)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(nuclear power plant, is radioactive)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(nuclear power plant, use uranium)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(nuclear reactor, use uranium)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(nuclear reactor, use uranium)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(power plant, is vs nuclear)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(power plant, is nuclear)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(power plant, is nuclear)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be vs coal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(power plant, is vs nuclear)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(power plant, use uranium)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(power plant, is nuclear)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(power plant, is radioactive)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(power plant, is vs nuclear)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(power plant, is nuclear)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(power plant, is vs nuclear)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(power plant, be vs coal)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(power plant, use uranium)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(power plant, is radioactive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(power plant, use uranium)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(power plant, is radioactive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(power plant, be vs coal)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(power plant, be vs coal)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(power plant, use uranium)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(power plant, is radioactive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, use uranium)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, is radioactive)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, use uranium as fuel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, use uranium)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, use uranium)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, is radioactive)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, use uranium as fuel)