power plant: is vs nuclear

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.77
, plant
Weight: 0.73
, utility
Weight: 0.68
Siblings natural gas
Weight: 0.70
, nuclear reactor
Weight: 0.69
, hydro
Weight: 0.68
, power
Weight: 0.67
, turbine
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
is vs nuclear 1.00
be vs nuclear reactor 0.92
is nuclear 0.87
be vs coal 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(power plant, is vs nuclear)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(power plant, is vs nuclear)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(power plant, is vs nuclear)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(power plant, is vs nuclear)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be vs coal)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(power plant, is vs nuclear)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(power plant, is vs nuclear)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(power plant, is nuclear)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(power plant, is vs nuclear)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(power plant, is nuclear)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(power plant, is vs nuclear)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(power plant, is vs nuclear)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(power plant, be vs nuclear reactor)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(power plant, is vs nuclear)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(power plant, is nuclear)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(power plant, is vs nuclear)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(power plant, is nuclear)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(power plant, is vs nuclear)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(power plant, be vs coal)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(power plant, is vs nuclear)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(power plant, be vs coal)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(power plant, is vs nuclear)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(power plant, be vs coal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(power plant, is vs nuclear)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(power plant, is vs nuclear)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(power plant, is vs nuclear)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(power plant, is vs nuclear)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(power plant, is vs nuclear)