power plant: pose threat to aquatic life

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.77
, plant
Weight: 0.73
, utility
Weight: 0.68
Siblings natural gas
Weight: 0.70
, nuclear reactor
Weight: 0.69
, hydro
Weight: 0.68
, power
Weight: 0.67
, turbine
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
pose threat to aquatic life 1.00
be considered threat to ecological security 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(nuclear power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to ecological security)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to ecological security)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to ecological security)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(nuclear power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to ecological security)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be considered threat to ecological security)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(power plant, be considered threat to ecological security)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(power plant, be considered threat to ecological security)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(power plant, be considered threat to ecological security)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to ecological security)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(power plant, pose threat to aquatic life)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be considered threat to ecological security)