power plant: were built near water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.77
, plant
Weight: 0.73
, utility
Weight: 0.68
Siblings natural gas
Weight: 0.70
, nuclear reactor
Weight: 0.69
, hydro
Weight: 0.68
, power
Weight: 0.67
, turbine
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
were built near water 1.00
be built near water 0.98
be near water 0.91
be built near ocean 0.90
be located near water 0.89
be built 0.85
is are built 0.84
being are built 0.82
be near rivers 0.80
be located in coastal areas 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(nuclear power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(power plant, were built near water)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be built near water)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(power plant, were built near water)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(nuclear power plant, is are built)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(power plant, were built near water)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(nuclear power plant, being are built)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(power plant, were built near water)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be built)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(power plant, were built near water)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be near water)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(power plant, were built near water)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be located near water)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(power plant, were built near water)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be built near ocean)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(power plant, were built near water)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(power plant, were built near water)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be near rivers)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(power plant, were built near water)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be built near ocean)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be near rivers)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be near water)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be located near water)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be built near water)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, were built near water)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be located in coastal areas)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be built)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, being are built)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, is are built)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be built near ocean)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be near rivers)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be built)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, is are built)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be located in coastal areas)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, being are built)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, were built near water)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be built near water)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be near water)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be located near water)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(nuclear power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(power plant, were built near water)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be built near water)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(power plant, were built near water)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be near water)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(power plant, were built near water)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be located near water)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(power plant, were built near water)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be built near ocean)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(power plant, were built near water)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be built)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(power plant, were built near water)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(nuclear power plant, is are built)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(power plant, were built near water)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(nuclear power plant, being are built)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(power plant, were built near water)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be near rivers)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(power plant, were built near water)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(power plant, were built near water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(power plant, were built near water)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be built near water)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be built near ocean)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(power plant, be built near ocean)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(power plant, be located near water)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(power plant, be near water)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(power plant, be built near water)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(power plant, be built near ocean)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be near water)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be located near water)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(power plant, be built near water)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be near rivers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(power plant, be near water)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(power plant, be near rivers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(power plant, be near water)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(power plant, be near rivers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(power plant, be built near water)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be built)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(power plant, be located near water)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(power plant, is are built)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(power plant, be located near water)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(power plant, be near rivers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(power plant, be built near ocean)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(power plant, be built)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(power plant, is are built)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(power plant, be built)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(power plant, is are built)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(power plant, is are built)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(power plant, be built)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(power plant, were built near water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be located near water)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be near water)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be built near ocean)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be built near water)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be located in coastal areas)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be near rivers)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, were built near water)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be built)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, being are built)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, is are built)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be located near water)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be near water)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be built near ocean)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be built near water)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, were built near water)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be near rivers)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be located in coastal areas)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be built)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, being are built)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, is are built)