power: be related force

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents power plant
Weight: 0.67
, force
Weight: 0.67
, signal
Weight: 0.66
, fuel
Weight: 0.65
Siblings nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.71
, wisdom
Weight: 0.62
, holy spirit
Weight: 0.62
, parliament
Weight: 0.62
, iran
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related force 1.00
be related 0.83
be related to energy 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(force, be related)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(power, be related force)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(power, be related force)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(force, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(power, be related force)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(force, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(force, be related)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(power, be related force)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(power, be related force)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(power, be related force)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(power, be related force)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(power, be related force)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(power, be related)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(power, be related force)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(power, be related to energy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(power, be related force)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(power, be related to energy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(power, be related force)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(power, be related to energy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(power, be related force)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(power, be related to energy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(power, be related force)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(power, be related)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(power, be related force)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(power, be related)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(power, be related force)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(power, be related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(power, be related force)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(power, be related force)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(power, be related force)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(power, be related force)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(power, be related force)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(power, be related force)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(force, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(power, be related force)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(force, be related)