predator: attack fox

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, insect
Weight: 0.59
, movie
Weight: 0.58
, hazard
Weight: 0.58
Siblings grizzly bear
Weight: 0.75
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.73
, spider
Weight: 0.73
, beetle
Weight: 0.72
, owl
Weight: 0.71

Related properties

Property Similarity
attack fox 1.00
attack 0.82
attack humans 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(predator, attack fox)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(owl, attack)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(predator, attack fox)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(owl, attack)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(owl, attack)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(predator, attack fox)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(predator, attack fox)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(predator, attack fox)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(predator, attack)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(predator, attack fox)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(predator, attack)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(predator, attack fox)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(predator, attack)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(predator, attack fox)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(predator, attack)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(predator, attack fox)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(predator, attack fox)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(predator, attack fox)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(predator, attack fox)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(predator, attack fox)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(predator, attack fox)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(owl, attack)