predator: be adapted to hunting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, insect
Weight: 0.59
, movie
Weight: 0.58
, hazard
Weight: 0.58
Siblings grizzly bear
Weight: 0.75
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.73
, spider
Weight: 0.73
, beetle
Weight: 0.72
, owl
Weight: 0.71

Related properties

Property Similarity
be adapted to hunting 1.00
adapted to successful at hunting 0.95
be adapted hunt 0.92
be adapted 0.84
be adapted catch 0.81
hunt 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(predator, be adapted to hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(owl, hunt)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(predator, be adapted to hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(owl, hunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(owl, hunt)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(predator, be adapted to hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(predator, be adapted to hunting)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(predator, be adapted to hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(predator, be adapted hunt)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(predator, be adapted to hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(predator, adapted to successful at hunting)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(predator, be adapted to hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(predator, be adapted hunt)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(predator, be adapted to hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(predator, adapted to successful at hunting)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(predator, be adapted to hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(predator, be adapted hunt)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(predator, be adapted to hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(predator, be adapted catch)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(predator, be adapted to hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(predator, be adapted hunt)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(predator, be adapted to hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(predator, be adapted)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(predator, be adapted to hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(predator, hunt)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(predator, be adapted to hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(predator, be adapted)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(predator, be adapted to hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(predator, adapted to successful at hunting)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(predator, be adapted to hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(predator, hunt)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(predator, be adapted to hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(predator, be adapted catch)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(predator, be adapted to hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(predator, be adapted catch)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(predator, be adapted to hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(predator, be adapted)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(predator, be adapted to hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(predator, be adapted catch)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(predator, be adapted to hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(predator, be adapted)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(predator, be adapted to hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(predator, hunt)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(predator, be adapted to hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(predator, hunt)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(predator, be adapted to hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(predator, adapted to successful at hunting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(predator, be adapted to hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(predator, be adapted to hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(predator, be adapted to hunting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(predator, be adapted to hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(predator, be adapted to hunting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(predator, be adapted to hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(owl, hunt)