predator: be good for prey

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, insect
Weight: 0.59
, movie
Weight: 0.58
, hazard
Weight: 0.58
Siblings grizzly bear
Weight: 0.75
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.73
, spider
Weight: 0.73
, beetle
Weight: 0.72
, owl
Weight: 0.71

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for prey 1.00
play with prey 0.94
eat prey 0.93
kill prey 0.92
be smaller than prey 0.90
eat prey alive 0.89
cause prey population 0.88
circle prey 0.87
affect prey populations 0.86
balance prey in ecosystems 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(predator, be good for prey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(predator, be good for prey)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(predator, be good for prey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(predator, kill prey)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(predator, be good for prey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(predator, eat prey)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(predator, be good for prey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(predator, eat prey)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(predator, be good for prey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(predator, eat prey)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(predator, be good for prey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(predator, play with prey)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(predator, be good for prey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(predator, eat prey alive)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(predator, be good for prey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(predator, eat prey alive)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(predator, be good for prey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(predator, be smaller than prey)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(predator, be good for prey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(predator, eat prey alive)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(predator, be good for prey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(predator, affect prey populations)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(predator, be good for prey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(predator, play with prey)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(predator, be good for prey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(predator, affect prey populations)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(predator, be good for prey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(predator, eat prey)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(predator, be good for prey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(predator, circle prey)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(predator, be good for prey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(predator, play with prey)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(predator, be good for prey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(predator, play with prey)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(predator, be good for prey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(predator, balance prey in ecosystems)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(predator, be good for prey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(predator, kill prey)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(predator, be good for prey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(predator, balance prey in ecosystems)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(predator, be good for prey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(predator, kill prey)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(predator, be good for prey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(predator, kill prey)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(predator, be good for prey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(predator, be smaller than prey)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(predator, be good for prey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(predator, affect prey populations)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(predator, be good for prey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(predator, circle prey)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(predator, be good for prey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(predator, circle prey)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(predator, be good for prey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(predator, be smaller than prey)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(predator, be good for prey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(predator, eat prey alive)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(predator, be good for prey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(predator, be smaller than prey)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(predator, be good for prey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(predator, circle prey)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(predator, be good for prey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(predator, balance prey in ecosystems)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(predator, be good for prey) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(predator, affect prey populations)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(predator, be good for prey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(predator, balance prey in ecosystems)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(predator, be good for prey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(predator, be good for prey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(predator, be good for prey)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(predator, be good for prey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(predator, be good for prey)