predator: control preys population

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, insect
Weight: 0.59
, movie
Weight: 0.58
, hazard
Weight: 0.58
Siblings grizzly bear
Weight: 0.75
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.73
, spider
Weight: 0.73
, beetle
Weight: 0.72
, owl
Weight: 0.71

Related properties

Property Similarity
control preys population 1.00
be wary of preys 0.88
cause prey population 0.87
be wary of preys featuring 0.85
affect prey populations 0.85
kill prey 0.81
eat prey 0.80
be good for prey 0.79
play with prey 0.78
eat prey alive 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(predator, control preys population)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(predator, control preys population)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(predator, control preys population)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(predator, affect prey populations)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(predator, control preys population)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(predator, affect prey populations)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(predator, control preys population)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(predator, eat prey)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(predator, control preys population)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(predator, kill prey)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(predator, control preys population)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(predator, eat prey alive)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(predator, control preys population)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(predator, be good for prey)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(predator, control preys population)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(predator, play with prey)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(predator, control preys population)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(predator, affect prey populations)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(predator, control preys population)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(predator, eat prey)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(predator, control preys population)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(predator, eat prey alive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(predator, control preys population)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(predator, kill prey)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(predator, control preys population)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(predator, eat prey)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(predator, control preys population)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(predator, affect prey populations)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(predator, control preys population)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(predator, kill prey)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(predator, control preys population)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(predator, play with prey)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(predator, control preys population)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(predator, play with prey)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(predator, control preys population)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(predator, eat prey alive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(predator, control preys population)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(predator, eat prey alive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(predator, control preys population)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(predator, eat prey)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(predator, control preys population)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(predator, kill prey)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(predator, control preys population)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(predator, be good for prey)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(predator, control preys population)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(predator, be good for prey)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(predator, control preys population)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(predator, play with prey)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(predator, control preys population)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(predator, be good for prey)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(predator, control preys population)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(predator, control preys population)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(predator, control preys population)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(predator, control preys population)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(predator, control preys population)