pregnant woman: be with toxoplasmosis treated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woman
Weight: 0.75
, person
Weight: 0.68
, pregnancy
Weight: 0.68
, teenager
Weight: 0.68
Siblings old woman
Weight: 0.42
, young man
Weight: 0.38
, grandmother
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with toxoplasmosis treated 1.00
get toxoplasmosis 0.96
be more prone to foodborne illness 0.77
get yeast infections 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(woman, get yeast infections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pregnant woman, be with toxoplasmosis treated)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pregnant woman, be with toxoplasmosis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(woman, get yeast infections)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(pregnant woman, be with toxoplasmosis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(woman, get yeast infections)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(woman, get yeast infections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(pregnant woman, be with toxoplasmosis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(pregnant woman, be with toxoplasmosis treated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pregnant woman, be with toxoplasmosis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(pregnant woman, be with toxoplasmosis treated)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(pregnant woman, be with toxoplasmosis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(pregnant woman, get toxoplasmosis)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(pregnant woman, be with toxoplasmosis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(pregnant woman, get toxoplasmosis)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(pregnant woman, be with toxoplasmosis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(pregnant woman, get toxoplasmosis)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pregnant woman, be with toxoplasmosis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(pregnant woman, get toxoplasmosis)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(pregnant woman, be with toxoplasmosis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(pregnant woman, be more prone to foodborne illness)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pregnant woman, be with toxoplasmosis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(pregnant woman, be more prone to foodborne illness)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(pregnant woman, be with toxoplasmosis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(pregnant woman, be more prone to foodborne illness)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(pregnant woman, be with toxoplasmosis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(pregnant woman, get yeast infections)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(pregnant woman, be with toxoplasmosis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(pregnant woman, get yeast infections)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pregnant woman, be with toxoplasmosis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(pregnant woman, get yeast infections)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(pregnant woman, be with toxoplasmosis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pregnant woman, get yeast infections)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(pregnant woman, be with toxoplasmosis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(pregnant woman, be more prone to foodborne illness)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(pregnant woman, be with toxoplasmosis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pregnant woman, be with toxoplasmosis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(pregnant woman, be with toxoplasmosis treated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pregnant woman, be with toxoplasmosis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pregnant woman, be with toxoplasmosis treated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(pregnant woman, be with toxoplasmosis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(woman, get yeast infections)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(pregnant woman, be with toxoplasmosis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(woman, get yeast infections)