premium: be high for obamacare

Property	Similarity
be high for obamacare	1.00
be high with obamacare	0.99
be for obamacare	0.95
go up with obamacare	0.91
increase with obamacare	0.90
be under obamacare	0.89
go up under obamacare	0.89
rise under obamacare	0.88
have under obamacare increase	0.87
be under obamacare going	0.87

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(premium, be high for obamacare) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(premium, be for obamacare)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(premium, be high for obamacare) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(premium, be for obamacare)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(premium, be high for obamacare) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Salient(premium, go up with obamacare)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(premium, be high for obamacare) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(premium, go up with obamacare)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(premium, be high for obamacare) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(premium, be high with obamacare)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(premium, be high for obamacare) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Salient(premium, be high with obamacare)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(premium, be high for obamacare) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Salient(premium, increase with obamacare)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(premium, be high for obamacare) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(premium, go up with obamacare)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(premium, be high for obamacare) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(premium, increase with obamacare)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(premium, be high for obamacare) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(premium, increase with obamacare)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(premium, be high for obamacare) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(premium, be under obamacare)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(premium, be high for obamacare) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(premium, be for obamacare)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(premium, be high for obamacare) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(premium, be high with obamacare)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(premium, be high for obamacare) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(premium, go up with obamacare)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(premium, be high for obamacare) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Salient(premium, be under obamacare)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(premium, be high for obamacare) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(premium, go up under obamacare)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(premium, be high for obamacare) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(premium, be under obamacare going)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(premium, be high for obamacare) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Salient(premium, go up under obamacare)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(premium, be high for obamacare) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(premium, increase with obamacare)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(premium, be high for obamacare) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Salient(premium, rise under obamacare)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(premium, be high for obamacare) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Salient(premium, be under obamacare going)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(premium, be high for obamacare) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(premium, be for obamacare)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(premium, be high for obamacare) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(premium, rise under obamacare)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(premium, be high for obamacare) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(premium, rise under obamacare)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(premium, be high for obamacare) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(premium, go up under obamacare)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(premium, be high for obamacare) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(premium, have under obamacare increase)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(premium, be high for obamacare) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(premium, rise under obamacare)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(premium, be high for obamacare) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(premium, be under obamacare)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(premium, be high for obamacare) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(premium, be under obamacare going)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(premium, be high for obamacare) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(premium, go up under obamacare)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(premium, be high for obamacare) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(premium, have under obamacare increase)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(premium, be high for obamacare) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(premium, be under obamacare going)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(premium, be high for obamacare) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(premium, be high with obamacare)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(premium, be high for obamacare) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(premium, have under obamacare increase)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(premium, be high for obamacare) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(premium, be under obamacare)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(premium, be high for obamacare) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(premium, have under obamacare increase)

Parents	brand Weight: 0.68 , item Weight: 0.60 , value Weight: 0.60 , feature Weight: 0.59
Siblings	quality Weight: 0.33 , line item Weight: 0.32 , equity Weight: 0.32 , revenue Weight: 0.32

premium: be high for obamacare

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible