preparation: has quality questions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.62
, step
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, duty
Weight: 0.59
, matter
Weight: 0.59
Siblings training
Weight: 0.68
, planning
Weight: 0.62
, mouthwash
Weight: 0.55
, capsule
Weight: 0.54
, baking
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality questions 1.00
questions 0.92
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(preparation, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mouthwash, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(preparation, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(baking, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(preparation, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(planning, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(preparation, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(training, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(preparation, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(training, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(training, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(preparation, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(planning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(planning, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(preparation, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(baking, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(baking, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(preparation, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(mouthwash, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(mouthwash, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(preparation, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(preparation, has quality questions)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(preparation, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(preparation, questions)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(preparation, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(preparation, questions)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(preparation, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(preparation, questions)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(preparation, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(preparation, questions)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(preparation, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(preparation, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(preparation, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(preparation, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(preparation, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(preparation, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(preparation, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(preparation, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(preparation, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(preparation, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(preparation, has quality questions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(preparation, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(preparation, has quality questions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(preparation, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(training, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(preparation, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(planning, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(preparation, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(baking, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(preparation, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mouthwash, has quality good)