presentation: be important in customer service

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents performance
Weight: 0.64
, slide
Weight: 0.61
, website
Weight: 0.61
, detail
Weight: 0.60
Siblings lecture
Weight: 0.69
, speaker
Weight: 0.62
, concert
Weight: 0.61
, national convention
Weight: 0.57
, web page
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in customer service 1.00
be important in business 0.78
be important part of business 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(performance, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(presentation, be important in customer service)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(presentation, be important in customer service)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(performance, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(presentation, be important in customer service)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(performance, be important in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(performance, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(presentation, be important in customer service)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(presentation, be important in customer service)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(presentation, be important in customer service)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(presentation, be important in customer service)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(presentation, be important in customer service)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(presentation, be important in business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(presentation, be important in customer service)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(presentation, be important part of business)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(presentation, be important in customer service)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(presentation, be important in business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(presentation, be important in customer service)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(presentation, be important in business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(presentation, be important in customer service)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(presentation, be important part of business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(presentation, be important in customer service)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(presentation, be important part of business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(presentation, be important in customer service)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(presentation, be important in business)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(presentation, be important in customer service)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(presentation, be important part of business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(presentation, be important in customer service)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(presentation, be important in customer service)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(presentation, be important in customer service)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(presentation, be important in customer service)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(presentation, be important in customer service)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(presentation, be important in customer service)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(performance, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(presentation, be important in customer service)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(performance, be important in business)