presentation: is damn boring

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents performance
Weight: 0.64
, slide
Weight: 0.61
, website
Weight: 0.61
, detail
Weight: 0.60
Siblings lecture
Weight: 0.69
, speaker
Weight: 0.62
, concert
Weight: 0.61
, national convention
Weight: 0.57
, web page
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is damn boring 1.00
is boring 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(presentation, is damn boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lecture, is boring)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(presentation, is damn boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(lecture, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(lecture, is boring)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(presentation, is damn boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(presentation, is damn boring)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(presentation, is damn boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(presentation, is boring)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(presentation, is damn boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(presentation, is boring)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(presentation, is damn boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(presentation, is boring)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(presentation, is damn boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(presentation, is boring)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(presentation, is damn boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(presentation, is damn boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(presentation, is damn boring)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(presentation, is damn boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(presentation, is damn boring)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(presentation, is damn boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(lecture, is boring)