press: quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents statement
Weight: 0.65
, document
Weight: 0.59
, liberty
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, report
Weight: 0.58
Siblings news
Weight: 0.34
, bank statement
Weight: 0.34
, public speaking
Weight: 0.33
, speech
Weight: 0.33
, remark
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
quality 1.00
is quality 0.98
has quality good 0.89
has quality better 0.87
has quality bad 0.86
has quality right 0.84
has quality class 0.82
has quality worth 0.81
has quality function 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(press, quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(press, quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(news, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(press, quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(press, quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality class)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(press, quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(news, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(press, quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(news, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(news, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(press, quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(speech, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(press, quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(speech, has quality class)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(press, quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(news, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(news, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(press, quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(speech, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(speech, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(press, quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(press, quality)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(press, quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(press, is quality)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(press, quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(press, has quality bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(press, quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(press, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(press, quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(press, has quality bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(press, quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(press, has quality better)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(press, quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(press, is quality)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(press, quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(press, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(press, quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(press, is quality)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(press, quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(press, is quality)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(press, quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(press, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(press, quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(press, has quality better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(press, quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(press, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(press, quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(press, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(press, quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(press, has quality better)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(press, quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(press, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(press, quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(press, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(press, quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(press, quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(press, quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(press, quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(press, quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(press, quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(news, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(press, quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(speech, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(press, quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(speech, has quality class)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(press, quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(speech, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(press, quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(news, has quality bad)