price: be cheaper at consumer cooperative

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents valuation
Weight: 0.69
, amount
Weight: 0.66
, index
Weight: 0.66
, quantity
Weight: 0.64
Siblings rent
Weight: 0.64
, purchase
Weight: 0.62
, shipping
Weight: 0.59
, bid
Weight: 0.57
, reserve bank
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper at consumer cooperative 1.00
be important to consumers 0.80
is cheaper 0.80
be cheaper than item prices 0.78
be much cheaper on fragrancex 0.78
be comparatively cheaper than buying 0.78
be signals consumers buy 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(price, be cheaper at consumer cooperative)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shipping, is cheaper)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(price, be cheaper at consumer cooperative)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(price, be cheaper at consumer cooperative)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(price, be cheaper at consumer cooperative)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(shipping, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(shipping, is cheaper)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(price, be cheaper at consumer cooperative)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(price, be cheaper at consumer cooperative)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(price, be cheaper at consumer cooperative)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(price, be cheaper at consumer cooperative)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(price, be cheaper at consumer cooperative)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(price, be cheaper at consumer cooperative)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(price, be cheaper at consumer cooperative)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(price, be cheaper at consumer cooperative)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(price, be cheaper at consumer cooperative)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(shipping, is cheaper)