price: be for food in singapore increasing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents valuation
Weight: 0.69
, amount
Weight: 0.66
, index
Weight: 0.66
, quantity
Weight: 0.64
Siblings rent
Weight: 0.64
, purchase
Weight: 0.62
, shipping
Weight: 0.59
, bid
Weight: 0.57
, reserve bank
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for food in singapore increasing 1.00
be for food in singapore 0.94
be in singapore high 0.91
be in singapore 0.89
be much higher in uk 0.81
be higher in canada 0.80
be in canada higher 0.80
be for mtg on rise in canada 0.78
be in australia high 0.78
be more expensive in canada 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(price, be for food in singapore increasing)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(rent, be in singapore)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(price, be for food in singapore increasing)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(rent, be in singapore)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(rent, be in singapore)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(price, be for food in singapore increasing)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(price, be for food in singapore increasing)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(price, be for food in singapore increasing)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(price, be higher in canada)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(price, be for food in singapore increasing)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(price, be more expensive in canada)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(price, be for food in singapore increasing)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(price, be higher in canada)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(price, be for food in singapore increasing)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(price, be more expensive in canada)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(price, be for food in singapore increasing)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(price, be higher in canada)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(price, be for food in singapore increasing)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(price, be more expensive in canada)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(price, be for food in singapore increasing)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(price, be more expensive in canada)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(price, be for food in singapore increasing)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(price, be higher in canada)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(price, be for food in singapore increasing)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(price, be for food in singapore increasing)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(price, be for food in singapore increasing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(price, be for food in singapore increasing)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(price, be for food in singapore increasing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(price, be for food in singapore increasing)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(rent, be in singapore)