primary: be better for party system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents election
Weight: 0.63
, term
Weight: 0.57
, option
Weight: 0.55
, event
Weight: 0.52
, strategy
Weight: 0.50
Siblings general election
Weight: 0.64
, contest
Weight: 0.30
, race
Weight: 0.30
, probable cause
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better for party system 1.00
be important in system 0.81
is system used 0.79
be important in democratic system 0.78
has quality system 0.77
is system used together 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(term, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(primary, be better for party system)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(term, is system used)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(primary, be better for party system)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(term, is system used together)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(primary, be better for party system)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(primary, be better for party system)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(term, is system used)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(primary, be better for party system)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(term, is system used together)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(primary, be better for party system)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(term, has quality system)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(primary, be better for party system)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(term, has quality system)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(primary, be better for party system)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(term, is system used)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(primary, be better for party system)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(term, is system used together)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(term, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(primary, be better for party system)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(primary, be better for party system)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(term, is system used)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(primary, be better for party system)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(primary, be better for party system)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(term, is system used together)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(primary, be better for party system)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(primary, be better for party system)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(primary, be better for party system)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(primary, be better for party system)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(primary, be better for party system)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(primary, be better for party system)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(primary, be better for party system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(primary, be better for party system)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(primary, be better for party system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(primary, be better for party system)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(term, is system used)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(primary, be better for party system)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(term, is system used together)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(primary, be better for party system)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(term, has quality system)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(primary, be better for party system)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(term, is system used)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(primary, be better for party system)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(term, is system used together)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(primary, be better for party system)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(term, has quality system)