primate: has physical part faces

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.69
, wild animal
Weight: 0.67
, creature
Weight: 0.54
, man
Weight: 0.53
Siblings bonobo
Weight: 0.72
, monkey
Weight: 0.70
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.70
, baboon
Weight: 0.67
, great ape
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part faces 1.00
have flat faces 0.84
have forward facing eyes 0.80
has physical part nails 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(primate, has physical part faces)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(primate, has physical part faces)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(primate, has physical part faces)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(primate, have flat faces)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(primate, has physical part faces)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(primate, have flat faces)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(primate, has physical part faces)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(primate, have flat faces)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(primate, has physical part faces)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(primate, have forward facing eyes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(primate, has physical part faces)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part nails)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(primate, has physical part faces)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(primate, has physical part nails)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(primate, has physical part faces)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(primate, have flat faces)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(primate, has physical part faces)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(primate, has physical part nails)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(primate, has physical part faces)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(primate, have forward facing eyes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(primate, has physical part faces)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(primate, have forward facing eyes)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(primate, has physical part faces)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(primate, has physical part nails)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(primate, has physical part faces)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(primate, have forward facing eyes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(primate, has physical part faces)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(primate, has physical part faces)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part faces)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(primate, has physical part faces)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(primate, has physical part faces)