primate: has physical part fangs

Related concepts

Parents	animal Weight: 0.69 , wild animal Weight: 0.67 , creature Weight: 0.54 , man Weight: 0.53
Siblings	bonobo Weight: 0.72 , monkey Weight: 0.70 , spider monkey Weight: 0.70 , baboon Weight: 0.67 , great ape Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has physical part fangs	1.00
has physical part nails	0.81
show teeth	0.80
has physical part fingernails	0.78
has physical part tails	0.78
have canine teeth	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(primate, has physical part fangs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(spider monkey, has physical part tails)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(monkey, has physical part tails)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(baboon, show teeth)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(baboon, has physical part tails)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(baboon, has physical part fangs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(primate, has physical part fangs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(baboon, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(baboon, has physical part fangs)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(baboon, has physical part tails) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(baboon, has physical part tails)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(monkey, has physical part tails) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(monkey, has physical part tails)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

Remarkable(baboon, show teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(baboon, show teeth)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(spider monkey, has physical part tails) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(spider monkey, has physical part tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(primate, has physical part fangs)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part nails)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(primate, show teeth)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Salient(primate, has physical part nails)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part fingernails)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(primate, has physical part fingernails)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(primate, has physical part nails)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Salient(primate, show teeth)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part tails)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(primate, have canine teeth)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(primate, has physical part fingernails)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Salient(primate, have canine teeth)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.37

Typical(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(primate, have canine teeth)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.37

Typical(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(primate, has physical part nails)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(primate, have canine teeth)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.37

Typical(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(primate, has physical part fingernails)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(primate, show teeth)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(primate, has physical part tails)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(primate, has physical part tails)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.37

Typical(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(primate, has physical part tails)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.37

Typical(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(primate, show teeth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part fangs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(primate, has physical part fangs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(baboon, has physical part fangs)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(baboon, has physical part tails)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(spider monkey, has physical part tails)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(monkey, has physical part tails)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(baboon, show teeth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.14

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.37

Typical(primate, has physical part fangs) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)