primate: has physical part tails

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.69
, wild animal
Weight: 0.67
, creature
Weight: 0.54
, man
Weight: 0.53
Siblings bonobo
Weight: 0.72
, monkey
Weight: 0.70
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.70
, baboon
Weight: 0.67
, great ape
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part tails 1.00
has physical part chins 0.80
has physical part nails 0.79
has physical part fangs 0.78
has physical part fingernails 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(primate, has physical part tails)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(primate, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(spider monkey, has physical part tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(monkey, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(baboon, has physical part tails)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(baboon, has physical part fangs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(primate, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(primate, has physical part tails)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(primate, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(baboon, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(baboon, has physical part tails)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(primate, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(monkey, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(monkey, has physical part tails)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(primate, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(spider monkey, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(spider monkey, has physical part tails)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(primate, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(baboon, has physical part fangs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(baboon, has physical part fangs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(primate, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(primate, has physical part tails)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(primate, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part nails)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(primate, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(primate, has physical part nails)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(primate, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(primate, has physical part nails)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(primate, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part fingernails)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(primate, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(primate, has physical part fingernails)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(primate, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(primate, has physical part fingernails)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(primate, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(primate, has physical part nails)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(primate, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part fangs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(primate, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(primate, has physical part fangs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(primate, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(primate, has physical part fingernails)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(primate, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(primate, has physical part fangs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(primate, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(primate, has physical part fangs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(primate, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(primate, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part tails)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(primate, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(primate, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(baboon, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(spider monkey, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(monkey, has physical part tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(baboon, has physical part fangs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(primate, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)