primate: has physical part thumbs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.69
, wild animal
Weight: 0.67
, creature
Weight: 0.54
, man
Weight: 0.53
Siblings bonobo
Weight: 0.72
, monkey
Weight: 0.70
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.70
, baboon
Weight: 0.67
, great ape
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part thumbs 1.00
have opposable thumbs 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part thumbs)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(monkey, has physical part thumbs)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part thumbs)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(monkey, have opposable thumbs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(primate, has physical part thumbs)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(monkey, has physical part thumbs)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(monkey, has physical part thumbs)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(primate, has physical part thumbs)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(monkey, have opposable thumbs)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(monkey, have opposable thumbs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(primate, has physical part thumbs)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(primate, has physical part thumbs)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(primate, has physical part thumbs)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(primate, have opposable thumbs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(primate, has physical part thumbs)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(primate, have opposable thumbs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(primate, has physical part thumbs)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(primate, have opposable thumbs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(primate, has physical part thumbs)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(primate, have opposable thumbs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(primate, has physical part thumbs)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(primate, has physical part thumbs)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part thumbs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(primate, has physical part thumbs)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(primate, has physical part thumbs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part thumbs)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(monkey, has physical part thumbs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part thumbs)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(monkey, have opposable thumbs)