primate: have canine teeth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.69
, wild animal
Weight: 0.67
, creature
Weight: 0.54
, man
Weight: 0.53
Siblings bonobo
Weight: 0.72
, monkey
Weight: 0.70
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.70
, baboon
Weight: 0.67
, great ape
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
have canine teeth 1.00
show teeth 0.78
has physical part fangs 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(primate, have canine teeth)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(baboon, show teeth)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(primate, have canine teeth)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(baboon, has physical part fangs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(primate, have canine teeth)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(baboon, has physical part fangs)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(baboon, has physical part fangs)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(primate, have canine teeth)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(baboon, show teeth)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(baboon, show teeth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(primate, have canine teeth)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(primate, have canine teeth)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(primate, have canine teeth)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(primate, show teeth)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(primate, have canine teeth)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(primate, show teeth)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(primate, have canine teeth)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part fangs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(primate, have canine teeth)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(primate, has physical part fangs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(primate, have canine teeth)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(primate, show teeth)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(primate, have canine teeth)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(primate, has physical part fangs)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(primate, have canine teeth)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(primate, has physical part fangs)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(primate, have canine teeth)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(primate, show teeth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(primate, have canine teeth)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(primate, have canine teeth)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(primate, have canine teeth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(primate, have canine teeth)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(primate, have canine teeth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(primate, have canine teeth)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(baboon, has physical part fangs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(primate, have canine teeth)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(baboon, show teeth)