primate: have flat nails

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.69
, wild animal
Weight: 0.67
, creature
Weight: 0.54
, man
Weight: 0.53
Siblings bonobo
Weight: 0.72
, monkey
Weight: 0.70
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.70
, baboon
Weight: 0.67
, great ape
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
have flat nails 1.00
has physical part nails 0.85
have flat faces 0.78
has physical part fingernails 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(primate, have flat nails)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(primate, have flat nails)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(primate, have flat nails)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(primate, have flat faces)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(primate, have flat nails)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(primate, have flat faces)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(primate, have flat nails)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(primate, have flat faces)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(primate, have flat nails)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(primate, has physical part nails)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(primate, have flat nails)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(primate, has physical part nails)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(primate, have flat nails)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(primate, has physical part nails)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(primate, have flat nails)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(primate, have flat faces)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(primate, have flat nails)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(primate, has physical part fingernails)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(primate, have flat nails)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(primate, has physical part fingernails)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(primate, have flat nails)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(primate, has physical part fingernails)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(primate, have flat nails)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part nails)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(primate, have flat nails)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part fingernails)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(primate, have flat nails)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(primate, have flat nails)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(primate, have flat nails)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(primate, have flat nails)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(primate, have flat nails)