print: be do on clean paper

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents channel
Weight: 0.60
, reproduction
Weight: 0.58
, media
Weight: 0.58
, production
Weight: 0.58
Siblings publication
Weight: 0.63
, watercolor
Weight: 0.55
, stripe
Weight: 0.53
, herringbone
Weight: 0.41
, cartoon network
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be do on clean paper 1.00
be at paper 0.82
be do in colour 0.82
be paint on thick paper 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(print, be do on clean paper)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(watercolor, be paint on thick paper)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(print, be do on clean paper)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(watercolor, be paint on thick paper)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(watercolor, be paint on thick paper)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(print, be do on clean paper)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(print, be do on clean paper)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(print, be do on clean paper)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(print, be at paper)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(print, be do on clean paper)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(print, be do in colour)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(print, be do on clean paper)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(print, be do in colour)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(print, be do on clean paper)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(print, be do in colour)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(print, be do on clean paper)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(print, be at paper)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(print, be do on clean paper)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(print, be do in colour)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(print, be do on clean paper)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(print, be at paper)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(print, be do on clean paper)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(print, be at paper)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(print, be do on clean paper)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(print, be do on clean paper)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(print, be do on clean paper)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(print, be do on clean paper)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(print, be do on clean paper)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(print, be do on clean paper)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(watercolor, be paint on thick paper)