printer: be at home office

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer hardware
Weight: 0.72
, electronic device
Weight: 0.66
, computer network
Weight: 0.65
, business
Weight: 0.64
Siblings laptop computer
Weight: 0.39
, computer
Weight: 0.37
, personal computer
Weight: 0.37
, laptop
Weight: 0.37
, digital camera
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at home office 1.00
be at in office 0.93
be at office 0.93
be at post office 0.85
be at office build 0.83
be at newspaper office 0.81
be at house 0.80
be find in house 0.77
be at on desk 0.76
be at apartment 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(business, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(printer, be at home office)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(printer, be at home office)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(business, be at office build)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(printer, be at home office)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(business, be at office build)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(printer, be at home office)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(computer, be at in office)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(printer, be at home office)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(computer, be at office build)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(printer, be at home office)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(computer, be at house)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(printer, be at home office)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(computer, be at on desk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(business, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(printer, be at home office)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(printer, be at home office)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(printer, be at home office)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(computer, be at in office)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(computer, be at in office)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(printer, be at home office)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(computer, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(computer, be at office build)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(printer, be at home office)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(computer, be at house)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(computer, be at house)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(printer, be at home office)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(computer, be at on desk)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(computer, be at on desk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(printer, be at home office)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(printer, be at home office)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(printer, be at home office)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(printer, be at office)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(printer, be at home office)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(printer, be at office)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(printer, be at home office)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(printer, be at office build)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(printer, be at home office)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(printer, be at newspaper office)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(printer, be at home office)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(printer, be at newspaper office)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(printer, be at home office)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(printer, be at office build)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(printer, be at home office)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(printer, be at office build)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(printer, be at home office)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(printer, be at office build)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(printer, be at home office)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(printer, be at office)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(printer, be at home office)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(printer, be at office)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(printer, be at home office)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(printer, be at newspaper office)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(printer, be at home office)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(printer, be at newspaper office)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(printer, be at home office)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(printer, be at home office)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(printer, be at home office)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(printer, be at home office)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(printer, be at home office)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(printer, be at home office)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(business, be at office build)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(printer, be at home office)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(computer, be at in office)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(printer, be at home office)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(computer, be at office build)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(printer, be at home office)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(computer, be at house)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(printer, be at home office)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(computer, be at on desk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(printer, be at home office)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(business, be at office build)