printer: be at office build

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer hardware
Weight: 0.72
, electronic device
Weight: 0.66
, computer network
Weight: 0.65
, business
Weight: 0.64
Siblings laptop computer
Weight: 0.39
, computer
Weight: 0.37
, personal computer
Weight: 0.37
, laptop
Weight: 0.37
, digital camera
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at office build 1.00
be at in office 0.88
be at office 0.88
be at build 0.87
be at home office 0.83
be at post office 0.81
be at newspaper office 0.77
be build by human 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(business, be at build)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(printer, be at office build)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(business, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(printer, be at office build)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(printer, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(business, be at office build)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(printer, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(business, be at build)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(printer, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(business, be at office build)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(printer, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(business, be at build)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(printer, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(computer, be at office build)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(printer, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(computer, be at build)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(printer, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(computer, be at in office)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(business, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(printer, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(printer, be at office build)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(business, be at build)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(printer, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(printer, be at office build)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(printer, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(computer, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(computer, be at office build)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(printer, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(computer, be at in office)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(computer, be at in office)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(printer, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(computer, be at build)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(computer, be at build)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(printer, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(printer, be at office build)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(printer, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(printer, be at home office)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(printer, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(printer, be at home office)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(printer, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(printer, be at office)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(printer, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(printer, be at office)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(printer, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(printer, be at home office)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(printer, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(printer, be at newspaper office)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(printer, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(printer, be at home office)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(printer, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(printer, be at newspaper office)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(printer, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(printer, be at office)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(printer, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(printer, be at office)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(printer, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(printer, be at newspaper office)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(printer, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(printer, be at newspaper office)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(printer, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(printer, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(printer, be at office build)

Typical implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(printer, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(printer, be at office build)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(printer, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(business, be at office build)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(printer, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(business, be at build)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(printer, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(computer, be at office build)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(printer, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(computer, be at build)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(printer, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(computer, be at in office)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(printer, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(business, be at office build)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(printer, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(business, be at build)