prism: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.60
, system
Weight: 0.60
, lens
Weight: 0.58
, shape
Weight: 0.57
Siblings contact lens
Weight: 0.35
, camera lens
Weight: 0.34
, mirror
Weight: 0.34
, matrix
Weight: 0.32
, magnifying glass
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality bad 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(lens, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(prism, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(prism, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(lens, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(prism, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(lens, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(lens, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(prism, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(prism, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(prism, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(prism, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(prism, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(prism, has quality bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(prism, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(prism, has quality bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(prism, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(prism, has quality bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(prism, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(prism, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(prism, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(prism, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(prism, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(prism, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(prism, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(prism, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(lens, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(prism, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(lens, has quality better)