prison: be in rural areas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents facility
Weight: 0.60
, structure
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.57
, situation
Weight: 0.57
, officer
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bastille
Weight: 0.40
, jail
Weight: 0.37
, workhouse
Weight: 0.35
, courthouse
Weight: 0.33
, capital punishment
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in rural areas 1.00
be built in rural areas 0.96
be in coastal areas 0.85
be in affluent areas 0.81
change by people migrating to shanty towns 0.77
be in high pressure areas 0.76
change by people migrating to towns 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(place, be in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(prison, be in rural areas)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(place, change by people migrating to shanty towns)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(prison, be in rural areas)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(place, be in high pressure areas)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(prison, be in rural areas)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(prison, be in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(place, be in coastal areas)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(prison, be in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(place, be in high pressure areas)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(prison, be in rural areas)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(place, change by people migrating to shanty towns)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(prison, be in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(place, be in coastal areas)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(prison, be in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(place, change by people migrating to shanty towns)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(prison, be in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(place, be in high pressure areas)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(place, be in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(prison, be in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(prison, be in rural areas)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(place, change by people migrating to shanty towns)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(prison, be in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(prison, be in rural areas)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(place, be in high pressure areas)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(prison, be in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(prison, be in rural areas)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(prison, be in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(prison, be in rural areas)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(prison, be in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(prison, be built in rural areas)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(prison, be in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(prison, be built in rural areas)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(prison, be in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(prison, be built in rural areas)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(prison, be in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(prison, be built in rural areas)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(prison, be in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(prison, be in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(prison, be in rural areas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(prison, be in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(prison, be in rural areas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(prison, be in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(place, be in coastal areas)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(prison, be in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(place, be in high pressure areas)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(prison, be in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(place, change by people migrating to shanty towns)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(prison, be in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(place, be in coastal areas)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(prison, be in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(place, be in high pressure areas)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(prison, be in rural areas)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(place, change by people migrating to shanty towns)