prisoner: were treated by japanese

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.60
, person
Weight: 0.60
, victim
Weight: 0.59
, duty
Weight: 0.58
Siblings rapist
Weight: 0.64
, parole
Weight: 0.56
, black knight
Weight: 0.54
, juvenile
Weight: 0.49

Related properties

Property Similarity
were treated by japanese 1.00
were in japan treated 0.89
were treated in rome 0.84
were in japan treated world war 2 0.84
were treated 0.82
were at auschwitz treated 0.81
were treated in victorian times 0.80
were treated in ancient rome 0.79
be treated 0.79
were treated in times 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(victim, were treated)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(prisoner, were treated by japanese)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(victim, be treated)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(prisoner, were treated by japanese)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(prisoner, were treated by japanese)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(victim, were treated)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(prisoner, were treated by japanese)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(victim, be treated)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(prisoner, were treated by japanese)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(victim, were treated)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(prisoner, were treated by japanese)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(victim, be treated)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(victim, were treated)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(prisoner, were treated by japanese)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(prisoner, were treated by japanese)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(victim, be treated)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(prisoner, were treated by japanese)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(prisoner, were treated by japanese)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(prisoner, were treated by japanese)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(prisoner, were treated by japanese)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(prisoner, were treated by japanese)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(prisoner, be treated)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(prisoner, were treated by japanese)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(prisoner, be treated)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(prisoner, were treated by japanese)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(prisoner, were in japan treated world war 2)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(prisoner, were treated by japanese)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(prisoner, were in japan treated world war 2)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(prisoner, were treated by japanese)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(prisoner, were treated in victorian times)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(prisoner, were treated by japanese)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(prisoner, were treated by japanese)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(prisoner, were in japan treated world war 2)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(prisoner, were treated by japanese)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(prisoner, be treated)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(prisoner, were treated by japanese)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(prisoner, were in japan treated world war 2)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(prisoner, were treated by japanese)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(prisoner, were treated in victorian times)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(prisoner, were treated by japanese)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(prisoner, were treated by japanese)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(prisoner, were treated by japanese)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(prisoner, were treated by japanese)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(prisoner, were treated in victorian times)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(prisoner, were treated by japanese)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(prisoner, were treated in victorian times)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(prisoner, were treated by japanese)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(prisoner, be treated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(prisoner, were treated by japanese)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(prisoner, were treated by japanese)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(prisoner, were treated by japanese)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(prisoner, were treated by japanese)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(prisoner, were treated by japanese)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(prisoner, were treated by japanese)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(victim, were treated)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(prisoner, were treated by japanese)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(victim, be treated)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(prisoner, were treated by japanese)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(victim, were treated)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(prisoner, were treated by japanese)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(victim, be treated)