prisoner: were treated in ancient rome

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.60
, person
Weight: 0.60
, victim
Weight: 0.59
, duty
Weight: 0.58
Siblings rapist
Weight: 0.64
, parole
Weight: 0.56
, black knight
Weight: 0.54
, juvenile
Weight: 0.49

Related properties

Property Similarity
were treated in ancient rome 1.00
were treated in rome 0.93
were treated in victorian times 0.82
were in japan treated 0.80
were treated by japanese 0.79
were treated 0.78
were at auschwitz treated 0.78
were treated in times 0.77
be treated 0.77
were in japan treated world war 2 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(victim, were treated)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(victim, be treated)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(victim, were treated)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(victim, be treated)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(victim, were treated)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(victim, be treated)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(victim, were treated)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(victim, be treated)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(prisoner, be treated)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(prisoner, be treated)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(prisoner, were treated by japanese)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(prisoner, were treated in victorian times)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(prisoner, were in japan treated world war 2)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(prisoner, were treated by japanese)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(prisoner, be treated)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(prisoner, were treated in victorian times)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(prisoner, were treated by japanese)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(prisoner, were in japan treated world war 2)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(prisoner, were treated by japanese)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(prisoner, were treated in victorian times)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(prisoner, were treated in victorian times)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(prisoner, were in japan treated world war 2)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(prisoner, were in japan treated world war 2)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(prisoner, be treated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(victim, were treated)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(victim, be treated)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(victim, were treated)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(prisoner, were treated in ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(victim, be treated)